In car companies, marketing and sales often fight with each other. Marketing says that they have received so many leads but the sales conversion rate is too low. When sales leads are not enough, they say that marketing provides too few leads. When there are many leads, they say that the leads provided by marketing are of low quality. Bosses are often fooled by a few simple numbers in marketing or sales. They always feel that there is a problem but don't know who is right or wrong. They only know that they have spent a lot of advertising and event fees but have not increased sales much. In fact, the boss considers not only these issues, but also procurement/production volume (OEM), inventory/in-transit volume, delivery volume, and market share, all of which directly affect cash flow and profits. In the past, bosses saw a form like this: Such unstructured data is a challenge for the boss: it cannot present cause-and-effect relationships, nor can it quickly analyze the problem points and where to spend money to increase sales, and it cannot resolve the contradiction between marketing and sales. 1. Create a dynamic balance between marketing and sales systemsHow to truly balance the marketing and sales dynamics so that every penny spent has high output is a good proposition. In November 2018, when a CRM project of a well-known automobile brand was coming to an end, a classmate of mine who was in charge of the operation and management of the automobile company asked me: Production and sales coordination and marketing coordination are very difficult points for brand marketing companies, and marketing coordination is more difficult than production and sales coordination. How to solve this problem? This question has actually been bothering me for a long time. I have been thinking about it but have never given it deep reasoning. In 2019, we finally calmed down and took a result-oriented approach, breaking down key businesses, integrating result indicators and process indicators, and presenting common indicators in a structured manner. What prompted me to reason deeply is that once marketing synergy is solved, the overall sales increase will be very obvious, especially for brand car companies with 200 dealers. 2. Dynamically balanced marketing collaboration modelExplanation of main indicators:
If the boss often looks at such structured indicators, there will be a quarrel between marketing and sales! Moreover, these goals will be clearly broken down and everyone will focus on their own indicators. 3. If you just pile up indicators, it is not considered deep reasoningThe value of dynamic balance is revealed when setting a goal or adjusting a quantity. It can be deduced in forward and reverse directions. Assumption: The conversion rate is fixed over a period of time. Increasing the amount of valid leads will increase sales. Assumption: The amount of new valid leads in a fixed period is within a certain range. Improving the conversion ability of sales consultants will increase the conversion rate, shorten the transaction cycle, and increase sales is inevitable. Similarly, increasing the number of test drives will also increase conversion rates. From the above two assumptions, it can be seen that after tracking the data for three months, the boss will be very clear about whether to invest in advertising to attract new leads, organize activities to promote transactions, or improve the conversion ability of sales consultants at each stage. By understanding the cost of attracting new customers or the ROI of an activity based on past data, you will know whether the investment is worthwhile. For the Vice President of Sales/Vice President of Marketing, if they want to achieve a certain sales target, by comparing with the current actual situation, they will know what type of activities are needed to achieve various indicators and thus complete the sales target. This, in addition to satisfying the above-mentioned decision-making needs motivated by goal achievement, can also support the realization of deeper management intentions, which I will leave for everyone to deduce on their own. Appendix: The 4 yardsticks in the marketing field test the boss’s decision-making ability, the marketing’s global operation ability, the sales’ sales management ability, and the consultant’s conversion ability. Channel contribution evaluation, sales funnel (published, click link) Author: Wang Jianru Source: Wang Jianru's Planet B |
<<: Naixue-P8 Million Big Data Architect Phase I
>>: Hema Fresh Product Analysis
According to the conventional short video operati...
Fat is the most hated tissue in the body (no doub...
On July 18, 2015, at the Beijing Olympic Sports C...
The movement of glaciers constantly "carves&...
Zhihu order number 2500 cash income, batch brainl...
Analysis of clothing sales experts: quickly under...
Programming languages are not only tools for de...
The video maker is going to make cars, the home a...
For operations , user volume and revenue are the ...
Whether it is online e-commerce or offline stores...
WhatsApp is testing a new feature that allows use...
Salt is a necessity for human survival. Throughou...
WeChat Mini Program is an application that users ...
Why do we always call ships "ships"? Do...
If you have never written a brand planning propos...