More than 500 experts participate in the App Store review process; less than 1% of rejected developers file an appeal

More than 500 experts participate in the App Store review process; less than 1% of rejected developers file an appeal

As the Epic Games vs. Apple court case progresses, we’ve learned more details about the internal discussions between the companies about business models, etc. More information about the App Store review process has been revealed with the testimony of Trystan Kosmynka, one of the heads of the App Store.

In a new filing for the trial, Kosmynka detailed that about 5 million apps are submitted to the App Store each year, and the app rejection rate is less than 40%. In 2019, 4,808,685 apps were submitted to the App Store review process, of which 36% - or 1,747,278 - were rejected.

According to Kosmynka, of these rejected apps, about 215,000 violated Apple's privacy guidelines in some way. Every app submitted to the App Store first goes through static and dynamic analysis to detect whether the app violates any App Store rules or uses private APIs. There is also a step in the process to check whether the app is similar to another app in the App Store to avoid scams or knockoffs.

Then there is the manual review process, where more than 500 people work to review about 100,000 apps per week. As shown in the figure below, they can use multiple Apple devices to test these apps.

If an app is rejected, Apple will notify the developer, stating the reason why the app was not approved for the App Store. The developer can resubmit the app after fixing the errors pointed out by Apple, or contact the company to appeal the rejection decision. However, Kosmynka said that less than 1% of developers appeal the rejection of their applications.

Apple has been widely criticized for the way it handles third-party apps on iOS, as the company has been accused of using its power in the App Store to its own advantage and hurt potential competitors. While Apple says it is focused on privacy and security, one of Epic's arguments is that the company fails to review every app submitted to the store because deceptive apps are out there.

Emails released during testimony by App Store VP Matt Fischer show that Apple provided special API access to some major developers and companies, including Hulu. Meanwhile, it will be difficult for Epic to prove in court that the App Store's in-app purchase system is an abuse of monopoly power, as a recent analysis of the case outlined.

<<:  Say goodbye to battery life anxiety. You need to know these secrets about mobile phone fast charging

>>:  Apple iOS 15 leak summary: In addition to new icons, new lock screen, new notifications, there are 3 major changes

Recommend

Application of the user pyramid model: Zhihu case analysis!

As the proposer of the user pyramid model, the id...

Would you drink beer if it doesn't have alcohol?

Beer can be said to be a versatile artifact in su...

Why do users convert?

Before you start reading this article, please thi...

The calm before the outbreak? Comprehensive thinking about "Mini Programs"

Since WeChat announced the upcoming release of Mi...

Responsive Interaction in Material Design

Responsive interactions build trust and engage us...

Deep sea warning! Let's talk about our "fear below the sea level"

The blue ocean makes people feel relaxed and happ...

It's getting fierce. Sharks are having a "pajama party" | Nature Trumpet

Welcome to the 63rd issue of the Nature Trumpet c...

Why is it difficult for your solution to effectively solve the problem?

When you encounter any marketing problem, your ma...

A brief discussion on internal scrolling layout

1. What is inner scrolling layout? The so-called ...